Wrongful Death Case - Intake & Analysis Tool

A structured framework for evaluating wrongful death claims, identifying breach indicators, and analyzing causation across all healthcare settings.

Introduction to the Wrongful Death Case — Intake & Analysis Tool

Wrongful death cases demand a highly structured and methodical approach. These cases are complex, requiring careful analysis of the circumstances leading to the death, deviations from standards of care, and an exploration of whether earlier intervention could have altered the outcome. Legal teams must systematically evaluate medical records, timelines, and provider actions to build a comprehensive understanding of how negligence may have contributed to the tragic event.

The Wrongful Death Case — Intake & Analysis Tool is specifically designed to support attorneys in structuring their case analysis with precision and clarity. This tool is a comprehensive framework for evaluating the facts, identifying red flags, assessing breach of care, analyzing causation, and ultimately building a litigation strategy that ensures no detail is overlooked.

With this tool, attorneys can:

  • Screen Cases: Perform an initial evaluation to identify potential wrongful death cases based on key criteria.

  • Review Medical Records: Organize and analyze medical documentation, including critical assessments, interventions, and gaps that may indicate failure of care.

  • Analyze Breach: Compare the expected care against the actual care provided, identifying deviations and policy violations.

  • Map Causation: Establish a clear connection between breaches and the death, helping to determine whether delays or missed interventions contributed to the outcome.

  • Build Litigation Strategy: Develop a comprehensive legal strategy by mapping out the timeline, identifying key witnesses, and ensuring expert opinions align with the established facts.

This tool is an essential resource during:

  • Initial Case Screening: Helps identify red flags early and decide whether a case warrants further investigation.

  • Expert Preparation: Facilitates the development of expert opinions by organizing key facts and timelines.

  • Deposition Planning: Supports the creation of deposition strategies by outlining critical areas for questioning.

By organizing the complexities of wrongful death cases into a cohesive structure, the Wrongful Death Case — Intake & Analysis Tool enables attorneys to present a strong, evidence-based case that stands up to scrutiny. It ensures that each critical moment in the patient's care is thoroughly examined, allowing legal teams to address every facet of the case with clarity and confidence.

Wrongful Death Case — Intake & Analysis Tool

Wrongful death cases demand a precise, methodical approach. Attorneys must evaluate the circumstances leading to death, identify deviations from standards of care, and determine whether earlier intervention could have prevented the outcome.

This tool provides a comprehensive structure for intake, record review, breach analysis, causation mapping, and litigation strategy. Use it during initial screening, expert preparation, and deposition planning.

1. Initial Intake & Case Overview

Collect Core Information

• Patient demographics
• Date and time of death
• Location (hospital, LTC, ALF, home health, hospice)
• Primary diagnosis
• Comorbidities
• Events leading to death
• Witness accounts
• Family concerns

Identify Immediate Red Flags

• Sudden unexplained deterioration
• Delayed response to symptoms
• Missed assessments
• Medication errors
• Falls or injuries
• Infection or sepsis
• Delayed transfer or escalation

2. Records Required for Analysis

Medical Records

• Admission assessments
• Daily notes
• Vitals
• Labs and imaging
• Medication administration records (MAR)
• Provider orders
• Care plans
• Incident reports
• Transfer records
• Code blue documentation
• Death summary

Supplemental Records

• Facility policies
• Staffing schedules
• Prior complaints or deficiencies
• EMS reports
• Autopsy report (if available)
• Family communication logs

3. Timeline of Deterioration

Build a Clear, Chronological Timeline

• Baseline condition
• Early symptoms
• Abnormal vitals
• Abnormal labs
• Provider notifications
• Interventions ordered
• Interventions performed
• Reassessments
• Escalation or transfer
• Time of death

Identify Gaps

• Missing documentation
• Delayed assessments
• No follow-up after abnormal findings
• Contradictory entries

4. Breach Analysis Framework

Compare Expected vs. Actual Care

• Required assessments
• Required monitoring
• Required interventions
• Required provider notifications
• Required escalation steps
• Required documentation

Identify Deviations

• Missed or delayed assessments
• Abnormal vitals ignored
• No provider notification
• Delayed escalation
• Medication errors
• Incomplete documentation
• Policy violations

5. Causation Analysis

Key Causation Questions

• Would timely intervention have prevented deterioration?
• Was the harm foreseeable?
• Did delays contribute to death?
• Were red-flag symptoms ignored?
• Did the breach accelerate decline?

Evidence to Support Causation

• Timeline excerpts
• Abnormal labs or vitals
• Missed interventions
• Documentation gaps
• Expert opinion alignment